<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chomsky &#038; Co. on Nandigram</title>
	<link>http://amitavakumar.blogsome.com/2007/11/21/chomsky-co-on-nandigram/</link>
	<description>Reading Writing Teaching</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: moi</title>
		<link>http://amitavakumar.blogsome.com/2007/11/21/chomsky-co-on-nandigram/#comment-858</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:03:32 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://amitavakumar.blogsome.com/2007/11/21/chomsky-co-on-nandigram/#comment-858</guid>
					<description>I think Anjaan Singh might have been a little more nuanced in his/her comment, but there's little doubt that Waris is responding in the most limited and literal sense possible. I don't know about all the signatories, but Victoria Brittain looks pretty white to me (even if she is really from Bengal). In any case, whether someone's skin color is black, brown, or white is irrelevant in this debate. Tariq Ali, if I'm not mistaken, is British-Pakistani, and Vijay Prashad is from an elite Indian background and, if I'm not mistaken, a permanent resident of the United States. They have a stake in the white-dominated US and UK. I'm not sure whether that's what Anjaan was trying to get at. Although they are distinguished scholars and writers, it is not altogether surprisinig that these signatories' concerns seem largely removed from the reality of the peasants in Nandigram -- and, in that sense, utterly academic. The signatories are effectively saying the peasants of Nandigram must share in the world's burden of resisting those who were put in office (or at least allowed to take office) by American voters. That is offensively self-absorbed. American and British citizens/ permanent residents can fight their own battles at home, make their democracies work, and remove the &quot;rancor&quot; from their &quot;public space&quot;. They should leave the peasants of Bengal alone if they can't actually support their right to live securely on their land, and practice their way of life. &lt;i&gt;Especially&lt;/i&gt; if they call themselves leftist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think Anjaan Singh might have been a little more nuanced in his/her comment, but there&#8217;s little doubt that Waris is responding in the most limited and literal sense possible. I don&#8217;t know about all the signatories, but Victoria Brittain looks pretty white to me (even if she is really from Bengal). In any case, whether someone&#8217;s skin color is black, brown, or white is irrelevant in this debate. Tariq Ali, if I&#8217;m not mistaken, is British-Pakistani, and Vijay Prashad is from an elite Indian background and, if I&#8217;m not mistaken, a permanent resident of the United States. They have a stake in the white-dominated US and UK. I&#8217;m not sure whether that&#8217;s what Anjaan was trying to get at. Although they are distinguished scholars and writers, it is not altogether surprisinig that these signatories&#8217; concerns seem largely removed from the reality of the peasants in Nandigram &#8212; and, in that sense, utterly academic. The signatories are effectively saying the peasants of Nandigram must share in the world&#8217;s burden of resisting those who were put in office (or at least allowed to take office) by American voters. That is offensively self-absorbed. American and British citizens/ permanent residents can fight their own battles at home, make their democracies work, and remove the &#8220;rancor&#8221; from their &#8220;public space&#8221;. They should leave the peasants of Bengal alone if they can&#8217;t actually support their right to live securely on their land, and practice their way of life. <i>Especially</i> if they call themselves leftist.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: waris</title>
		<link>http://amitavakumar.blogsome.com/2007/11/21/chomsky-co-on-nandigram/#comment-806</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://amitavakumar.blogsome.com/2007/11/21/chomsky-co-on-nandigram/#comment-806</guid>
					<description>Anjaan:
You are wrong.
Tariq Ali, Walden Bello, Vijay Prashad and Victoria Brittain are not &quot;white people&quot;. They are Pakistani, Filipino, and Indian. You might wonder about someone named Victoria Brittain: she is from Bengal.
Waris.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Anjaan:<br />
You are wrong.<br />
Tariq Ali, Walden Bello, Vijay Prashad and Victoria Brittain are not &#8220;white people&#8221;. They are Pakistani, Filipino, and Indian. You might wonder about someone named Victoria Brittain: she is from Bengal.<br />
Waris.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anjaan Singh</title>
		<link>http://amitavakumar.blogsome.com/2007/11/21/chomsky-co-on-nandigram/#comment-804</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 08:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://amitavakumar.blogsome.com/2007/11/21/chomsky-co-on-nandigram/#comment-804</guid>
					<description>Oh great! Nandigram at last, but only following the lead of some white people! No condemnation?

How about Taslima Nasreen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oh great! Nandigram at last, but only following the lead of some white people! No condemnation?</p>
	<p>How about Taslima Nasreen?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
